![]() ![]() It adds sharpening (depending on the setting), in other words. Produces fine detail with improved edge definition Why? They're inextricably-linked parts of the same process - that's precisely why there's a Details slider in the NR tool panel, which (to quote the Help file): The noise tool should not have any impact on RAW conversion aside of noise reduction It's hard to fault the results of that implementation.īut "50" applied to a 100 ISO image is much different to "50" applied to a 6400 ISO image: Capture One's NR is adaptive and ISO-specific.Īlso details are on 50 and it seems to sharpen picture a bit (which I usually do not expect from the noise reduction settings. Lightroom's Luminance LR panel has three sliders PictureCode's PhotoNinja - in addition to two sliders - gives you a choice of three different NR engines! It also actively works alongside the Sharpening dialogue, intelligently altering the NR taking into account sharpening choices.Īlso noise reduction is doing something (set to 50) even if there is no noise to remove!Īnd again, pretty much all Raw converters apply a "baseline" of NR by default, some (like Capture One) apply some NR even with the slider at "0". I can't think of a single serious Raw converter that doesn't need the user to juggle with more than one slider in order to get an optimal balance between noise reduction and detail retention. This is a bad implementation of the interface because you always need to tweak two sliders. This has been very frustrating and disappointing and I can't help but feel very empathetic to anyone who spent their hard earned money on the "upgrade" - even when it was -30% cheaper. I'm glad I didn't upgrade and the way it looks v12 is not going to be replaced any time soon.Īnd now that they totally dismantled the support system for Capture One users vs PhaseOne shooters I don't see any reason to continue purchasing anything from PhaseOne any more. It looks nice in the videos but it's super clunky and tedious, imprecise and is very limited in its range and results. The new color editor tool is a gimmick and far too limited in reality and gives no advantage compared to the previous version. ![]() The dynamic range tool does not bring any actual improvements, simply working with levels and curves bring the exact same results and it's not even quicker. The noise reduction tool is not very useful for modern cameras with a very high frequency noise, causing artifacts in the finale image unless you reduce the details by a lot. There are bugs with hardware acceleration, leading to artifacts in the editor and corrupting files during export and finally crashes that require a system reboot to fix. Скачать программу PictureCode Photo Ninja 1.4.So I've been giving v20 a try, mostly because I wanted to try out the "new" Dynamic Range and Noise Reduction features.Īfter 4 days I have to say I'm quite shocked! Somehow they made the new version worse than the old version was: Photoshop plug-ins have been removed for the time being.When installed in V1.3.10 or earlier versions of Photo Ninja, a key issued after Mawill appear to have an earlier issue date, but it will function normally if it is a permanent key. Recognizes new license key encoding to extend the date range.Improved metadata parsing of high ISO values above 65535 for some FujiFilm and possibly other cameras.Added support for FujiFilm GFX 100, X-S10.Tweaked algorithm formulation for sharpening, reduced minimum radius, and made step sizes more consistent.Improved UI scaling on HighDPI displays.Added option for automatic light/dark mode switching on MacOS.Reworked interface of the "Change Appearance" dialog.Streamlined main toolbar to use less vertical space and to reduce visual clutter.Updated UI look and feel, with refinements of both light and dark themes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |